WHO WE ARE         HOME         SPECIALIST AREAS         
        LATEST NEWS/BLOG        FAQ'S        CONTACT
Learner plate Welcome to the B.A.D.D.I.A blog page for all our latest news and information
Filed under: News — John @ 7:13 pm

A CAR was left teetering on a cliff edge after the driver followed sat nav directions down a Pennine footpath.

Robert Jones continued to follow the instructions when they told him the narrow, steep path he was driving on in Todmorden, West Yorkshire, was a road.

Mr Jones, from Doncaster, South Yorkshire, only stopped when his BMW hit a fence above Gauxholme railway bridge on Sunday morning.

Police have charged Mr Jones with driving without due care and attention.

The 43-year-old, who works as a driver, said he relied on his sat nav for his job.

He described Sunday’s incident, during a visit to friends in Todmorden, as “a nightmare”.

A West Yorkshire Police spokesman said: “Officers received a call at 11.18am on Sunday March 22 reporting that a BMW was hanging off the edge of a cliff off Bacup Road.

“The driver was a 43-year-old man from Doncaster. He has been summonsed to court for driving without due care and attention.”

CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO

Source: The BBC website


Filed under: News — John @ 6:43 pm

The Driving Standards Agency (DSA) has confirmed its new test fee structure for 2009/10 following a public consultation in October last year.

The fee increases will apply to theory and practical driving tests booked on or after 30 March 2009. Fees relating to the Approved Driving Instructor scheme will increase from 24 April.

General fee increases include;

  Current fee New fee
Car theory test £30.00 £31.00
Car practical test £56.50 £62.00
Motorcycle theory test £30.00 £31.00
Motorcycle practical test * £80.00 £90.50

* (in October 2009)

DSA Chief Executive, Rosemary Thew, thanked the public for participating in the public consultation, and said: “We are doing everything we can to ensure that fees remain as low as possible for our customers – particularly during the current economic climate.

“Despite this, increases are necessary to cover general running costs, development work and increases in inflation.

“The Agency is largely self-funding. We receive only a small amount from general taxation and have to recover most of our costs through test fees.

“We are confident that these increases will enable us to maintain our high standards and provide a first class service to all our customers.”

The full list of test fees is included in the response to consultation report which is available if you CLICK HERE

Source: The DSA website



Filed under: Driving Lessons, Older Drivers, Road Safety, Young Drivers — John @ 10:00 am

A COUNCIL is spending GBP5,000 pounds of taxpayers’ money on teaching its staff not to drive too quickly.

Oxford City Council is paying for 50-minute “green driving” lessons in order to save money on fuel - but they are not cutting expenses handed out to staff.

More than 330 workers from every department were this week being given a £30 pounds class in efficient driving.

However, the classes in efficient driving were branded a waste of taxpayers’ cash by critics.

Employees will be told not to accelerate too quickly, move into higher gears earlier and remove excess weight from their vehicles.

They are also being taught to observe roads carefully so they can save fuel.

Tutors will lead drivers around Oxford city centre in a vehicle which records fuel efficiency.

The Energy Saving Trust, part funded by the taxpayer, is picking up half the £10,000 pounds bill for the classes.

The lessons were being given to everyone who used council vehicles and workers who used their own cars while working for the local authority.

However, people claiming mileage for using their own cars will not have their expenses cut – even though they will be driving more efficiently and using less fuel.

The city council claimed today/yesterday (Mon) that it expected to cut fuel bills by £69,000 pounds – or 15 percent – following the lessons.

A spokesman said they would monitor the miles per gallon on all vehicles and will follow it up after the training.

John Tanner, the city council’s Board member for a Cleaner, Greener, Oxford, defended the scheme.

“Some of our drivers, like the street cleansing team, can clock up more than 450 miles a week,” he said.

“This training shows the drivers that if they alter the way they drive we can reduce our carbon emissions and save money.”

Susie Squire, a spokesman for the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said that the driving lessons were extravagant and unnecessary.

“This is an incredibly high amount of money to spend on driving lessons,” she said.

“We are in a recession and the council should be delivering savings for taxpayers and not spending so much on this.

“It is important to save fuel but there’s no reason why one person could have gone on the course and passed the information on saving even more money.”

Source: The Telegraph website


PROFESSIONAL footballers who own some of the most powerful cars on the road are being offered extra driving lessons by their own union.

 Gordon Taylor, PFA Chief  Executive. (PA Photos)

The PFA scheme, being launched at the City of Manchester stadium, follows several high-profile incidents involving players.

Last month, Manchester United’s Carlos Tevez had his £140,000 Bentley seized because he did not have a UK licence.

And Cristiano Ronaldo hit the headlines when he crashed his Ferrari.

The incident happened in January when the winger hit the barrier in a tunnel near Manchester Airport.

The PFA said the aim of the scheme, which will be run in conjunction with BSM driving school, was to make footballers “better drivers“.

Manchester City is also offering its youth team the specially designed driving awareness session.

PFA Chief Executive Gordon Taylor said: “The one thing that’s important for a young male is that they want to buy a car and that car is often very powerful.

“We have to make these youngsters aware of how it can be virtually a weapon of destruction if not handled carefully.”

Advanced driving

But the courses, from pre-driving education through to advanced driving courses, will be open to footballers of all levels – including top Premier League stars like Ronaldo.

Mr Taylor said the winger’s tunnel crash “could have been very tragic”.

“He was very fortunate when you think of his value to Manchester United and the career in front of him,” added the PFA boss.

“That would be an example of what can happen because sometimes players don’t always appreciate the power in these cars.”

WATCH BBC VIDEO CLICK HERE

Source: The BBC News website


Filed under: Driving Instructors, Driving Schools, News, learner drivers — John @ 12:07 pm

UNSCRUPULOUS driving Instructor schools are taking advantage of people who have been made redundant by promising new recruits they will earn great money from being an instructor at a time when learner numbers are falling.

A survey by the Alliance of Sector Skills Council Scotland collected data from a range of industries to assess how trade was holding up and how they foresaw the recession impacting on business.

GoSkills, the council representing passenger transport, which covers bus, rail, taxi and aviation industries, and also driving instructors and schools, reported a fall in demand from new learners: “Driving instructors have been reporting a downturn in business. This would normally happen after Christmas but has been particularly marked for this period last quarter of 2008.”Among the key indicators are reports from the Driving Standards Agency (DSA) that test centre figures are down 5%. More worryingly, GoSkills warned that an increase in redundancies could see new instructors flooding the industry and chasing fewer learners.

Richard Wheater from GoSkills said: “The driving instructor’s job is sometimes seen as a soft option and people are a little bit misinformed about it when they see the adverts on TV.

“You see the salaries that can potentially be earned, so yes, it’s a risk.”

One of the UK’s fastest growing driving schools, Red, which also trains instructors, told the Sunday Herald it had seen a “surge” in interest during the past 12 months. It is due publish official figures tomorrow.

There are 40,000 driving instructors in the UK, 3,000 of them in Scotland.

Barbara Trafford, managing director of the ADI Federation, said the market is already “saturated”. She said: “There’s always been a trend for people training as driving instructors, but what’s worrying me now with the credit crisis is that there are a lot of people, perhaps with redundancy money, who are looking to see if they can earn money elsewhere. Unfortunately, the adverts are not quite true, because we are saturated. We are not looking for more driving instructors.”

She claimed the situation in Scotland was particularly dire because recruits were especially vulnerable to “hard-sell” tactics. Someone who attends an interview in England and is persuaded to sign up to a financial agreement, typically a loan starting at around £3000 to cover training costs, would be entitled to withdraw within a fixed period of time but candidates in Scotland have no “cooling-off” period, she said.

Tied into a contract and faced with high-interest repayments on their loans, they are dismayed to discover there is no guarantee of qualifying, let alone earning the promised high salaries.

Trafford said: “It’s been going on for 10 years or more, but it does seem to be increasing and becoming an industry in its own right. It’s not one that anyone in our industry agrees with, because we believe people are sucked into it, they’re given the hard sell, they’re signing on, and then they’re not getting what they thought they would be, and they end up unsuccessful at the end.

“I had someone ring me the other day and say they promised they would give me a job of 40 hours a week’. I said, well, did you get that in writing’ and they said, no, they said they couldn’t put it in writing’. I wonder why. That is what they’re being told – and it’s wrong.”

Aeneas MacRitchie has 40 years’ experience as an instructor, examiner, and, until last year, as an instructor trainer and now represents the Driving Instructors Scottish Council in meetings with the DSA.

He said: “If I said 50% of my business came from the companies we’re speaking about, which advertise nationally on television, radio etc, that would be an understatement. What these people found was that they were spending their money, and when they came to part three they were getting a week’s intensive training which was grossly inefficient – far too much knowledge to take in too short a period of time.

“And as a result they would then contact someone like myself. I would take them out and their knowledge was very limited and they were having to fork out additional money to me.”

Source: Sunday Herald website, By Helen McArdle


Filed under: News, Older Drivers, Other, Road Safety, Young Drivers — John @ 10:00 am

THE LOWERING of speed limits from 60 mph to 50 mph on some of Britain’s roads is likely to be policed by cameras that calculate drivers’ average speed.

Several London boroughs want to be among the first to use the cameras Photo: SARAK BROOK

Plans to lower the speed limits on most rural single-carriageway roads have been drawn up by ministers in a bid to reduce the number of road deaths.

The Department for Transport confirmed that one of the options it was looking at to police such a scheme is the use of average speed cameras.

Ministers are keen to increase the use of average speed cameras as they help to slow traffic down and trigger fewer convictions.

Unlike traditional speed cameras, average speed cameras work by measuring how fast a car travels over a stretch of road.

Traditional speed cameras have been hugely unpopular with many motorists who claim that the fines amount to little more than a stealth tax.

Andrew Howard, head of road safety at the Automobile Association, said: “So far, average speed cameras have been very successful in the way they have reduced speed and got drivers to comply with the limits.

“There is nothing wrong with them if they are used to enforce a sensible speed limit, and the best laws work if people think they are good laws.”

Average speed cameras work over a range of distances, with cameras recording the registration numbers at the start and finish and then calculating the speed of the vehicle based on this information.

The plans to lower the speed limit comes after figures showed that a higher proportion of accidents happen on single-carriageway A roads in the countryside than on other parts of the network.

In 2007, there were 3,946 deaths and 30,000 serious injuries on British roads – with speed being a factor in 29 per cent of them.

Britain was top of the world league on road safety some years ago, but has slipped down the chart recently.

It follows a wave of other proposals unveiled by the Government last year, including a new penalty of six points on a driving licence for motorists who broke speed limits “excessively” – meaning that they could receive a driving ban after two such offences.

A formal “drug drive limit” is also being considered in the wake of figures showing that 20 per cent of road deaths are caused by drivers on illegal substances.

A spokesman for the DFT said: “This is something that is being looked at, no decisions have yet been taken.

“Any such proposal would have to be based on robust evidence of the impact on casualties, emissions and journey times. It would also need to consider issues of enforcement and public acceptability.”

Source: Telegraph website By Myra Butterworth, Personal Finance Correspondent


Filed under: News, Other, Road Safety — John @ 10:55 am

MOTORIST Colin Gant has been forced to seek counselling to help cure a bizarre phobia of speed cameras.

 Colin Grant (right) has suffered from a genuine phobia of speed cameras for four years, despite never being caught by one. Photo: ARCHANT

Despite being an advanced driver who has never had a speeding ticket, Mr Gant is terrified of the fixed-point Gatsos – just in case they incorrectly flash him.

Driving 500 miles a week, he regularly takes huge detours to avoid camera sites and said that if he sees a speed camera he suffers a panic attack and has to pull over.

The situation became so serious that eventually he was invited by a local camera safety partnership team for a “behind the scenes” look at how the cameras worked in a bid to debunk the myth and cure his phobia.

Mr Gant, 41, said: “Every time I drove past one I started worrying about what would happen if I was caught speeding: would I lose my job? How would it affect my family?

“The irony is I’ve never been caught speeding and actually hate it when people drive too fast and I fully support the principle behind speed cameras. My wife would say that I drive very cautiously.

“I realised I could allow it to control me and had to something about it.”

Mr Gant, from Lowestoft, Suffolk, first realised he had a problem four years ago yet was too embarrassed to tell his friends or work colleagues about it.

He said: “I don’t think there was any one moment when I suddenly realised it was becoming a problem.

“There was a growing realisation that something was wrong. It started playing on my mind all the time.

“It was difficult to explain to people. If you’re scared of spiders people can understand that but nobody understands this.”

Part of the condition was a fear of the unknown and concerns that the cameras could be accidentally triggered, exposing him to an unjust prosecution.

Mr Gant, who admits his phobia is “completely irrational”, found himself constantly anticipating the next box and often driving several miles on back streets to avoid camera sites.

He has been helped by Norfolk Safety Camera Partnership, which has attempted to prove how reliable the cameras are.

Insp Marcus Rowe said: “We invited him to the office and basically just explained how we work and tried to remove the mystery surrounding this.

“One of his concerns was that he could be unfairly prosecuted so we explained that we work to thresholds designed to eliminate room for error.

“We always allow for at least 10 per cent of the speed limit and even beyond that we offer driver training to those who only just break the threshold. Prosecution is not our only focus.”

A spokesman for Anxiety UK said Mr Gant was not alone in suffering the speed camera phobia and said their own chief executive has the same fear.

He said one in six adults experienced some form of “neurotic health problem” in their lives.

Source: Telegraph website, By Nick Britten


Filed under: News, Other — John @ 12:22 pm

THE VEHICLE excise duty system (road tax) is changing from April 1.

Vehicles registered after March 2001 will still be taxed on emissions, but the number of ‘tax bands’ is increasing from seven, to thirteen. These are:

Tax band A (up to 100g/km CO2) no fee
Tax band B (101- 110g/km CO2) £35
Tax band C (111-120g/km CO2) £35
Tax band D (121-130g/km CO2) £120
Tax band E (131-140g/km CO2) £120
Tax band F (141- 150g/km CO2) £125
Tax band G (151 to 160g/km CO2) £150
Tax band H (161 to 170g/km CO2) £175
Tax band I (171 to 180g/km CO2) £175
Tax band J (181 to 200g/km CO2) £215
Tax band K (201 to 225g/km CO2) £215
Tax band L (226 to 255g/km CO2) £405
Tax band M (Over 255g/km CO2) £405

However, some polluting vehicles receive a reprieve. Models emiting over 225g/km of CO2, and registered between March 1, 2001 and March 23, 2006 – join band K.

Vehicles registered before March 2001 are taxed on engine size. Models up to 1549cc cost £125, and vehicles over 1549cc cost £190. The prices change again in April 2010 – rewarding the environmental and punishing polluters.

Motorists wishing to avoid the complications should drive pre 1973 cars – classics are road tax exempt.
Source: motoring.co.uk website  By Stephen Turvil


Filed under: Driving Instructors, Driving Tests, News, learner drivers — John @ 11:24 am

A NORTHERN IRELAND girl has made history by taking a successful legal action against the Government after being denied a pass in her driving test.

The action — believed to be the first of its kind in the UK — came about after the Co Down teenager was deemed to have made an incorrect manoeuvre during the exam.

But she refused to accept the examiner’s ruling — and her driving instructor started what were unprecedented legal proceedings on her behalf.

The matter has now been settled out of court, with the Driver and Vehicle Agency (DVA) agreeing to refund the £42 test fee to the girl — who passed her test one week after being failed.

Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph last night, the driving instructor, Jim Miskimmin, who paid hundreds of pounds in legal fees, said he was pleased with the outcome.

“They would have to change the Highway Code for me to fail on this, so I was pretty confident that I would be successful,” he said.

“I went through all the channels before finally getting the matter to court. It was settled this week and I’m extremely happy with the result.”

The girl, who wishes to remain anonymous, first took the exam in Downpatrick on May 18, 2008.

According to Mr Miskimmin, who runs the J Miskimmin School of Motoring in Ballynahinch, she failed after notching up three minor faults and one “incorrect” major fault.

“She was coming along the Ballydugan Road, which is a single lane going into two lanes,” he said.

“My pupil thought she was going back to the test centre, so she stayed in the right hand lane.”

“Just as she entered the lane the examiner said he wanted her to follow the road for Belfast and the town centre, so she proceeded to move safely into the left hand lane. But she was failed because the examiner said she should have been in the left hand lane from the beginning.”

Mr Miskimmin, however, maintained that his pupil was not in breach of the rules of the road and instigated legal proceedings.

“The Highway Code concludes that in a two-lane situation you stay in the left hand lane unless the road signs or markings indicate otherwise,” he said.

“In this situation, the road signs do indicate otherwise, so by staying in the right hand lane she was committing no offence. That’s why I advised her to take legal action.”

A DVA spokesman last night said the merits of the individual case had been considered before a refund was decided.

“Having considered the individual circumstance of this case it appears that the candidate may have needed clearer instruction at the particular stretch of road. In the circumstances, a sympathetic view was taken of this individual case and the decision was taken to refund her fee.

“Circumstances in which the result of a driver test can be challenged are relatively narrow and relate solely to the proper conduct of the test and not to the examiner’s discretion in assessing the standard of the candidate’s driving.”

Source: Belfast Telegraph By Claire McNeilly


Members Login | Register With Us
Powered by TH UK Online Marketing